header-logo header-logo

Swiss success in climate change claim

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Environment , Climate change litigation , EU
printer mail-detail
A group of more than 2,000 Swiss women aged above 64 years old have won a landmark case on climate change at the European Court of Human Rights

In Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland (application no 53600/20), the group successfully argued their government’s inaction breached their Art 2 rights as their age and gender made them particularly susceptible to dying during heatwaves.

The Strasbourg court held by a 16:1 majority the Swiss authorities had breached Art 8 (private and family life) and, unanimously, they had breached Art 6(1) (access to court).

Specifically, the court found the Swiss authorities had failed to quantify, through a carbon budget or otherwise, national greenhouse gas emissions limitations, had failed to meet its past reduction targets, and had not acted in time and in an appropriate way to devise, develop and implement relevant legislation and measures.

Vesselina Newman, fundamental rights lead at ClientEarth, which submitted evidence to the court on the legal issues, said: ‘This is not just a win for these inspirational claimants but a huge victory for those everywhere seeking to use the power of the law to hold their government accountable for climate inaction.  

‘This is also a European first for climate litigation. As this court ruling is binding, signatory states now have a clear legal duty to ensure their climate action is sufficient to protect human rights, and judges across Europe will have to apply these new principles to the growing number of climate cases before them.

‘The influence of these decisions also goes beyond Europe’s borders. Human-rights based climate cases are before courts in Brazil, Peru, Australia and South Korea, with these rulings potentially having an impact for those crucial proceedings as well.’

The Strasbourg court delivered Grand Chamber rulings in three climate change cases this week. In Duarte Agostinho and Others v Portugal and 32 Others (application no 39371/20), a claim by six Portuguese nationals born between 1999 and 2012 was declared inadmissible. Another climate change case brought by a former mayor of a French coastal town was also dismissed.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll