header-logo header-logo

10 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Environment , Climate change litigation , EU
printer mail-detail

Swiss success in climate change claim

A group of more than 2,000 Swiss women aged above 64 years old have won a landmark case on climate change at the European Court of Human Rights

In Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland (application no 53600/20), the group successfully argued their government’s inaction breached their Art 2 rights as their age and gender made them particularly susceptible to dying during heatwaves.

The Strasbourg court held by a 16:1 majority the Swiss authorities had breached Art 8 (private and family life) and, unanimously, they had breached Art 6(1) (access to court).

Specifically, the court found the Swiss authorities had failed to quantify, through a carbon budget or otherwise, national greenhouse gas emissions limitations, had failed to meet its past reduction targets, and had not acted in time and in an appropriate way to devise, develop and implement relevant legislation and measures.

Vesselina Newman, fundamental rights lead at ClientEarth, which submitted evidence to the court on the legal issues, said: ‘This is not just a win for these inspirational claimants but a huge victory for those everywhere seeking to use the power of the law to hold their government accountable for climate inaction.  

‘This is also a European first for climate litigation. As this court ruling is binding, signatory states now have a clear legal duty to ensure their climate action is sufficient to protect human rights, and judges across Europe will have to apply these new principles to the growing number of climate cases before them.

‘The influence of these decisions also goes beyond Europe’s borders. Human-rights based climate cases are before courts in Brazil, Peru, Australia and South Korea, with these rulings potentially having an impact for those crucial proceedings as well.’

The Strasbourg court delivered Grand Chamber rulings in three climate change cases this week. In Duarte Agostinho and Others v Portugal and 32 Others (application no 39371/20), a claim by six Portuguese nationals born between 1999 and 2012 was declared inadmissible. Another climate change case brought by a former mayor of a French coastal town was also dismissed.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll