header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 March 2019 / Aziz Rahman
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Tackling unexplained wealth

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Aziz Rahman considers the implications of a possible increase in the use of unexplained wealth orders by enforcement agencies
 
  • The appeal of UWOs to authorities.
  • Criteria for a UWO.
  • The application process.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) has made it clear that it has examined 140 cases to see if they are suitable for an unexplained wealth order (UWO). Nobody expects 140 UWOs to become a reality in the immediate future. But it can only be a matter of time before the number of UWOs rises above the current total of two.

The NCA has made specific reference to Russian-owned assets, possibly as a direct result of the poisoning in Salisbury last year of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia. The UK authorities seem to be viewing UWOs as a legal means of attacking Russian interests, either in retaliation for Salisbury or as an attempt to remove the UK’s unwanted reputation as a popular destination for those looking to move and invest laundered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll