header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Tactile voting devices unlawful, High Court rules

The government’s arrangements for blind and partially sighted voters at polling stations are unlawful, the High Court has held.

The judicial review, brought by Rachael Andrews, who is registered blind, challenged the use of tactile voting devices (TVDs), plastic sheets that fit on top of the ballot paper. Andrews argued that voters still need the help of another person to read them the candidates’ names and order of appearance.

The court agreed the device ‘does not in any realistic sense enable that person to vote’, in R (Andrews) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2019] EWHC 1126 (Admin).

Leigh Day partner Sean Humber, who acted for Andrews, said blind and partially sighted voters ‘should be able to exercise their voting rights in the same way as everyone else―secretly and independently’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll