header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Take a look at the new look NLJ

Why the new NLJ?

NLJ is acutely aware of the momentous changes the Jackson reforms are bringing to the profession and while the goal of those reforms, to conduct litigation in an effective and economically sensible way, is widely viewed as a worthy one, we understand that implementing the reforms within your firm will not always be easy.

Faster paced litigation and an emphasis on proportionate preparation may, in some cases, involve a cultural change and that changing the way cases are managed and costs budgeted is going to require new practices and modifications in the way you do business.

Unique online sections: To assist you through this time of change, NLJ is pleased to introduce its new-look website with unique sections geared towards helping the practitioner navigate the post-Jackson world:

• NLJ Masterclasses
These exclusive online updates have a special focus on the Jackson reforms and chart how these momentous changes to procedure and practice will impact on you. Written by experts, these online classes provide invaluable commentary on Jackson pain points including CFAs, DBAs, disclosure,proportionality, Pt 36 offers and QOCS. These are enriched by a fully searchable exclusive Jackson archive,
charting the progress and intricacies of these major changes.

• Costs management
We know that this will be a challenge for most fi rms as new rules bed in and firms adopt new budgeting techniques, so we are delighted that HH Judge Simon Brown QC has written an exclusive series of online articles for NLJ – outlining the extensive changes to costs budgeting, case management, and proportionality. Judge Brown’s series kick-starts this new section, driven by costs experts, which is geared to avoiding the pitfalls of costs management.

• Litigation trends
While every firm will approach Jackson differently, we want to monitor trends and shifts in the marketplace and look at the impact of the reforms, how costs budgeting plans are being implemented and look to see how fi rms are restructuring and why. This exclusive survey will chart the impact of the Jackson changes in their fi rst year and provide a regular overview of how the changes are affecting the profession.

Bookmark www.newlawjournal.co.uk and sign up to our e-newsletter today to ensure you and your clients are Jackson savvy and follow us on Twitter to keep up-to-date with developments in the post-Jackson world of litigation.

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll