header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Taking back control over retained EU law (Pt 6)

132283
The ping-pong match is finally over: Michael Zander KC reports on the final stages of the Retained EU Law Bill
  • After much to-ing and fro-ing in Parliament, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill finally received royal assent on 29 June 2023.
  • Amendments by the House of Lords which were rejected by the House of Commons included assurances that there would be no slippage in environmental protection.

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill received royal assent on 29 June 2023. The final exchanges (‘ping-pong’) had no less than six iterations. The amendments passed by the Lords at the report stage were considered by the Commons on 24 May. The Bill went back to the Lords on 6 June, back to the Commons on 12 June, back to the Lords on 20 June, back to the Commons on 21 June and, finally, back to the Lords on 26 June.

Sunset schedule

During the report stage in the Lords, the government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll