header-logo header-logo

Taking cover

13 May 2020 / Chavah Apfelbaum
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
20592
Could the COVID-19 class action against Hiscox be successful, asks Chavah Apfelbaum

Hiscox Action Group and the Night Time Industries Association have threatened to bring a class/collective action against Hiscox for refusing to pay out business interruption claims arising from disruption caused by COVID-19. The groups collectively represent more than 500 Hiscox policyholders with insurance cover of over £50m.

Given the UK’s national shutdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the sheer volume of related claims, estimated to cost in excess of £1bn, insurers will be resistant to pay out. The outcome of this class action will set a precedent for future lawsuits against insurers in the wake of COVID-19.

What is covered?

Will the policy cover the effects of a pandemic and losses caused by the national lockdown? The relevant standard Hiscox policy appears to state that policyholders are insured for financial losses resulting from:

  • an interruption to business caused by inability to use the insured premises due to restrictions imposed by a public authority during the period of insurance following
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll