header-logo header-logo

Taking flight

21 February 2019 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Why are expert witnesses stopping work? Mark Solon reports

One third of expert witnesses have considered stopping their work as an expert witness and two thirds of experts would stop doing legal aid work if expert witness fees were further reduced. These are two of the findings from the expert witnesses surveyed in The Times & Bond Solon 2018 Expert Witness survey.

They wrote: ‘More complex work, fewer hours, less pay, shorter deadlines, more pressure, more administration....Very demanding and not worth the stress of my life....Not getting paid and the increasing tension of reducing fees.... Solicitors sometimes do not accept/understand how much time a complex case can take.’

We must remember that expert witnesses have a day job and expert witness work is a secondary source of income. If the expert’s fees are too low, experts have to decide whether the case is worth their time and worth coping with the stress of respecting the tight deadlines set by the court. Also, since the judgment in Jones v Kaney [2011]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll