header-logo header-logo

Taking flight

21 February 2019 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Why are expert witnesses stopping work? Mark Solon reports

One third of expert witnesses have considered stopping their work as an expert witness and two thirds of experts would stop doing legal aid work if expert witness fees were further reduced. These are two of the findings from the expert witnesses surveyed in The Times & Bond Solon 2018 Expert Witness survey.

They wrote: ‘More complex work, fewer hours, less pay, shorter deadlines, more pressure, more administration....Very demanding and not worth the stress of my life....Not getting paid and the increasing tension of reducing fees.... Solicitors sometimes do not accept/understand how much time a complex case can take.’

We must remember that expert witnesses have a day job and expert witness work is a secondary source of income. If the expert’s fees are too low, experts have to decide whether the case is worth their time and worth coping with the stress of respecting the tight deadlines set by the court. Also, since the judgment in Jones v Kaney [2011]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll