header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 June 2008 / Alex Gunning
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taking a gamble

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

When can licensing authorities use their discretion to grant a casino licence? Alex Gunning reports

The Gambling Act 2005 (GA 2005) ushered in a new era for casino gaming and, with it, an initial restriction on the number of new casino licences. Under GA 2005 new licences have been initially limited to eight large, eight small casinos and one regional (or super) casino, though the proposal for the latter has been mired in controversy and (for the time-being at least) shelved.

Fearing the closing of an opportunity to obtain casino licences as a result of the implementation of GA 2005, a number of operators decided to make applications for new licences under the transitional provisions of the preceding Gaming Act 1968 (GA 1968), in which a considerable discretion is conferred on the licensing authority (ie the local licensing justices and, on appeal, the Crown Court).

Those applications have led to fundamental questions being raised about the meaning and effect of GA 1968 40

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll