header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Alex Gunning
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taking a gamble

When can licensing authorities use their discretion to grant a casino licence? Alex Gunning reports

The Gambling Act 2005 (GA 2005) ushered in a new era for casino gaming and, with it, an initial restriction on the number of new casino licences. Under GA 2005 new licences have been initially limited to eight large, eight small casinos and one regional (or super) casino, though the proposal for the latter has been mired in controversy and (for the time-being at least) shelved.

Fearing the closing of an opportunity to obtain casino licences as a result of the implementation of GA 2005, a number of operators decided to make applications for new licences under the transitional provisions of the preceding Gaming Act 1968 (GA 1968), in which a considerable discretion is conferred on the licensing authority (ie the local licensing justices and, on appeal, the Crown Court).

Those applications have led to fundamental questions being raised about the meaning and effect of GA 1968 40

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll