header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

​Taking the hit

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
29 May 2015 / David Burrows
Issue: 7654 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7654_burrows

Does lack of clarity in the legal aid scheme prevent access to justice, asks David Burrows

A new government, a new Justice Secretary: there is no likelihood of improvement to the legal aid scheme. But is it now time to reflect on the lack of clarity—for lawyer and lay-person alike—of the present scheme? In particular it is surely time to ask whether the present process for application for legal aid—for an applicant merely to be able to apply to the court or defend a claim—is fair given the complexity of the present statutory scheme? The question of the obscurity of the scheme for application for legal aid can be tested against two recent cases on applications for domestic violence and for county court (and thus family court) committal proceedings.

In Brown v London Borough of Haringey [2015] EWCA Civ 483, [2015] All ER (D) 126 (May) the Court of Appeal concluded, after a lengthy analysis of complex legal aid statutory and regulatory provisions, that applications for legal aid for committal proceedings in civil

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll