header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Taking the temperature

web_solon

Mark Solon shares the findings of this year’s Bond Solon Annual Expert Witness Survey

In the year when the Jackson reforms were implemented, the annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey reflects uncertainty as to whether they will cut costs, and downright pessimism about whether they will increase access to justice.

Out of the 353 people who attended the 19th Annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Conference in London in November, 165 returned their views on the latest legal developments. It is too early to assess the full effect of the Jackson reforms introduced in April, but so far they have not met with universal enthusiasm.

Costs

The hoped-for streamlining and cost reductions are intended to increase access to justice, but about two-thirds of respondents (67%) felt that this would not be achieved—a dispiriting response in the light of the cuts to legal aid. When asked whether the reforms would cut costs, only a minority of respondents (38%) believed that they would. They were balanced by the don’t knows (35%), with 1% not answering. Twelve per

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll