header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Taking the temperature

web_solon

Mark Solon shares the findings of this year’s Bond Solon Annual Expert Witness Survey

In the year when the Jackson reforms were implemented, the annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey reflects uncertainty as to whether they will cut costs, and downright pessimism about whether they will increase access to justice.

Out of the 353 people who attended the 19th Annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Conference in London in November, 165 returned their views on the latest legal developments. It is too early to assess the full effect of the Jackson reforms introduced in April, but so far they have not met with universal enthusiasm.

Costs

The hoped-for streamlining and cost reductions are intended to increase access to justice, but about two-thirds of respondents (67%) felt that this would not be achieved—a dispiriting response in the light of the cuts to legal aid. When asked whether the reforms would cut costs, only a minority of respondents (38%) believed that they would. They were balanced by the don’t knows (35%), with 1% not answering. Twelve per

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll