header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Taking a wrong turn

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
22 March 2018 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7786 / Categories: Opinion , Insurance surgery , Costs
printer mail-detail
nlj_7786_regan

Dominic Regan reflects on the fall-out from changing funding from legal aid to a conditional fee agreement

It is remarkable for the Court of Appeal to deliver a judgment running to 21 pages a week after a two-day hearing. Yet that is what happened in Surrey v Barnet and Chase Farms Hospitals NHS Trust (2018) EWCA Civ 451. The muscular decision is of profound significance to the profession.

Crucial timing

In the three cases which were under appeal, each claimant had been funded by legal aid in pursuit of clinical negligence damages. Just before the Jackson reforms kicked in on 1 April 2013, they all changed horse and entered into a conditional fee agreement (CFA) reinforced by after the event (ATE) insurance.

By the time each legal aid certificate was discharged, the defendant was in principle the paying party, although in one action there was still an important issue about causation to resolve. The timing was crucial. Any such arrangement created after that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll