header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2021 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-detail

Talkback: is guidance just guidance or not?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
38111
‘Substantial’ meals & staying at home: Fred Philpott compares current guidance with the actual law

I hope to expand upon the excellent article by the employment lawyer Juliet Carp in NLJ of 4 December 2020 (‘What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?’, 170 NLJ 7913, p9–11). I also pay tribute to the incisive piece on the subject by Lord Sumption in The Daily Telegraph (‘It is not the police’s job to enforce the lockdown whims of ministers’, The Daily Telegraph, 12 January 2021).

I wish to review some previous authorities dealing with guidance, and give two examples of how it has been used in the current situation.

I will start first with the coronavirus (COVID-19) example. Some official guidance has been promulgated as regards the work exemption. Some guidance has said, for example, that one must have some sort of formal presentation in order to get within the exemption. That is not so. It illustrates how so

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll