header-logo header-logo

Talking about a costs revolution

15 September 2023 / Liam Tolen
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
137522
Liam Tolen provides a guide for general counsel & in-house legal teams to the new fixed recoverable costs regime
  • The new fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime will be applied from 1 October 2023.
  • General counsel need to decide whether it’s in the best interest of their firm to begin litigation now, or to wait until the new FRC regime comes into play.

The new fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime is arguably the most significant reform to civil procedure in a generation. It does not tinker around the edges; it is wholesale reform.

Sir Rupert Jackson, the conceptual architect of FRC put it like this: ‘Controlling litigation costs (while ensuring proper remuneration for lawyers) is a vital part of promoting access to justice. If the costs are too high, people cannot afford lawyers. If the costs are too low, there will be no lawyers to do the work.’

From the perspective of a business grappling with decisions about whether or not to pursue a claim, it should be viewed through the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll