header-logo header-logo

15 September 2023 / Liam Tolen
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Talking about a costs revolution

137522
Liam Tolen provides a guide for general counsel & in-house legal teams to the new fixed recoverable costs regime
  • The new fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime will be applied from 1 October 2023.
  • General counsel need to decide whether it’s in the best interest of their firm to begin litigation now, or to wait until the new FRC regime comes into play.

The new fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime is arguably the most significant reform to civil procedure in a generation. It does not tinker around the edges; it is wholesale reform.

Sir Rupert Jackson, the conceptual architect of FRC put it like this: ‘Controlling litigation costs (while ensuring proper remuneration for lawyers) is a vital part of promoting access to justice. If the costs are too high, people cannot afford lawyers. If the costs are too low, there will be no lawyers to do the work.’

From the perspective of a business grappling with decisions about whether or not to pursue a claim, it should be viewed through

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll