header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tax

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2010] EWHC 2582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The question to be asked when considering discovery assessments and s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 was whether an officer of the commissioners had sufficient information to make a decision whether to raise an additional assessment. The statutory reference was to a hypothetical officer rather than a real individual. The hypothetical officer had to be endowed with knowledge of elementary arithmetic, some knowledge of tax law, and some tax law, all of which he would apply to the prescribed sources of information. The test of whether an officer could reasonably have been expected to be aware of an actual insufficiency was an objective test. “Awareness” was the officer’s awareness of an actual insufficiency in the self-assessment in question, rather than an awareness that he should do something to check whether there was an insufficiency. The sources of information referred to in s 29(6) of the Act were the only sources of information to be taken into account

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll