header-logo header-logo

Tax

28 October 2010
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2010] EWHC 2582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The question to be asked when considering discovery assessments and s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 was whether an officer of the commissioners had sufficient information to make a decision whether to raise an additional assessment. The statutory reference was to a hypothetical officer rather than a real individual. The hypothetical officer had to be endowed with knowledge of elementary arithmetic, some knowledge of tax law, and some tax law, all of which he would apply to the prescribed sources of information. The test of whether an officer could reasonably have been expected to be aware of an actual insufficiency was an objective test. “Awareness” was the officer’s awareness of an actual insufficiency in the self-assessment in question, rather than an awareness that he should do something to check whether there was an insufficiency. The sources of information referred to in s 29(6) of the Act were the only sources of information to be taken into account

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll