header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tax

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2010] EWHC 2582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The question to be asked when considering discovery assessments and s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 was whether an officer of the commissioners had sufficient information to make a decision whether to raise an additional assessment. The statutory reference was to a hypothetical officer rather than a real individual. The hypothetical officer had to be endowed with knowledge of elementary arithmetic, some knowledge of tax law, and some tax law, all of which he would apply to the prescribed sources of information. The test of whether an officer could reasonably have been expected to be aware of an actual insufficiency was an objective test. “Awareness” was the officer’s awareness of an actual insufficiency in the self-assessment in question, rather than an awareness that he should do something to check whether there was an insufficiency. The sources of information referred to in s 29(6) of the Act were the only sources of information to be taken into account

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll