header-logo header-logo

Tax

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Cotter v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 69, [2013] All ER (D) 68 (Nov)

Where a taxpayer had included information in his tax return but had left it to the Revenue to calculate the tax which he was due to pay, the Revenue was entitled to treat as irrelevant to that calculation information and claims which clearly did not, as a matter of law, affect the tax chargeable and payable in the relevant year of assessment. It was clear from ss 8(1) and 8(1AA) of the Taxes Management Act 1970 that the purpose of a tax return was to establish the amounts of income tax and capital gains tax chargeable for a year of assessment and the amount of income tax payable for that year. In the context of ss 8(1), 9, 9A and 42 of the Act, a tax return referred to the information in the tax return form which was submitted for the purpose of establishing the amounts in which a person was chargeable to income tax and capital gains tax for the relevant year of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll