header-logo header-logo

Tax

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Cotter v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKSC 69, [2013] All ER (D) 68 (Nov)

Where a taxpayer had included information in his tax return but had left it to the Revenue to calculate the tax which he was due to pay, the Revenue was entitled to treat as irrelevant to that calculation information and claims which clearly did not, as a matter of law, affect the tax chargeable and payable in the relevant year of assessment. It was clear from ss 8(1) and 8(1AA) of the Taxes Management Act 1970 that the purpose of a tax return was to establish the amounts of income tax and capital gains tax chargeable for a year of assessment and the amount of income tax payable for that year. In the context of ss 8(1), 9, 9A and 42 of the Act, a tax return referred to the information in the tax return form which was submitted for the purpose of establishing the amounts in which a person was chargeable to income tax and capital gains tax for the relevant year of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll