header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Armajaro Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 571 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 41 (Nov)

Schedule 29 to the Finance Act 2002 applied to goodwill as it applied to an intangible fixed asset. Goodwill in Sch 29 had the same meaning as it had for accounting purposes. Intangible fixed asset was defined by para 2(1) of Sch 29 in relation to a company but not in relation to a partnership or LLP. Entitlement to relief under Sch 29 to the 2002 Act was dependent on the expenditure being reflected in the accounts of the company claiming entitlement to relief. The accounts had to be drawn up in compliance with UK GAAP. Relief under Pt 2 of Sch 29 was given by reference to expenditure written off or written down for accounting purposes. If accounting rules or practice did not permit the expenditure on acquiring an interest in an LLP to be treated as the acquisition of the LLP’s intangible fixed assets included then s 118ZA of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 did not change the accounting rules or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll