header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Armajaro Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 571 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 41 (Nov)

Schedule 29 to the Finance Act 2002 applied to goodwill as it applied to an intangible fixed asset. Goodwill in Sch 29 had the same meaning as it had for accounting purposes. Intangible fixed asset was defined by para 2(1) of Sch 29 in relation to a company but not in relation to a partnership or LLP. Entitlement to relief under Sch 29 to the 2002 Act was dependent on the expenditure being reflected in the accounts of the company claiming entitlement to relief. The accounts had to be drawn up in compliance with UK GAAP. Relief under Pt 2 of Sch 29 was given by reference to expenditure written off or written down for accounting purposes. If accounting rules or practice did not permit the expenditure on acquiring an interest in an LLP to be treated as the acquisition of the LLP’s intangible fixed assets included then s 118ZA of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 did not change the accounting rules or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll