header-logo header-logo

07 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax the City?

City law firms should make a financial contribution to legal aid, through a “tax” if need be, according to Geoffrey Bindman QC.

Writing in NLJ this week, Bindman, former leading legal aid solicitor and NLJ columnist, has backed the Lord Chancellor Michael Gove’s proposal that City firms contribute more to legal aid. However, he notes that “efforts to persuade prosperous lawyers to make a major contribution to the funding of legal services have a long history without significant result”.

Bindman argues that City law firms’ main contribution “must be financial” both because existing City pro bono programmes, although “highly commendable”, have “considerable limitations” due to a lack of expertise in the legal area concerned and because charitable efforts by the profession to raise funds for legal services “have not filled the gap”.

He suggests a levy of 10% on incomes over £150,000 which could be paid through a charity and therefore tax deductible.

City firms failed to welcome Gove’s suggestion, in June, that they contribute more. However, most of them already have substantial pro bono programmes and all do pro bono work, some of which is ground-breaking and innovative.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, for example, became the first City firm to win a Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year (Laly) award this year, jointly with Royal Courts of Justice Advice Bureau, for their development of Courtnav.

Linklaters has commissioned legal education charity Pro Bono Community to provide its lawyers with a bespoke training programme in housing law. The training covers legal advice at clinics, social security law and housing benefits, and common areas of housing law that arise at the advice clinic Linklaters runs in conjunction with the Mary Ward Legal Centre.

The training is part of Linklaters’ involvement in the Collaborative Plan for Pro Bono in the UK, and will be rolled out to in-house counsel and lawyers at other firms.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll