header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 September 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

From rhetoric to reality?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7667_bindman

Can Michael Gove save our legal system? Geoffrey Bindman QC shares his thoughts & hopes

Unlike his predecessor, our new Lord Chancellor is already signalling a principled approach to the need to repair our failing judicial system. In his speech on 23 June 2015 to the Legatum Institute he spoke eloquently in praise of the rule of law. Yet he also recognised “a dangerous inequality at the heart of our system” acknowledging that “while those with money can secure the finest legal provision in the world the reality for many of our citizens is that the justice system is failing them badly”. Interestingly, Mr Gove blames this situation on antiquated working methods and “grotesque inefficiencies”, ignoring the adverse impact of the savage cuts imposed by his government and its predecessors.

Justice in an age of austerity

Recently (see “A message for Mr Gove”, NLJ, 29 May 2015, p 9) I wrote about the proposals published earlier this year by a working party of Justice (of which I was a member) under the title “Delivering

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll