header-logo header-logo

Tax Credits (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/848)

20 March 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend multiple tax credit instruments in order to achieve a series of changes to update and clarify the tax credit system.

Commencement date

Partly on 6 April 2012; Fully on 1 May 2012


Legislation Affected

SI 2002/2005, SI 2002/2006, SI 2002/2007, SI 2002/2014, SI 2002/2173, SI 2003/653, SI 2003/654, SI 2003/742 amended

Summary

Alter the qualifying working hours for a couple with children in relation to working tax credit, requiring couples with children to work 24 hours a week between the two of them. One partner must work at least 16 of these.

Reduce the time for backdating and paying claims to a third of their previous levels, from 93 days to 31 days. Halve the period in which someone must notify HMRC about the account into which tax credits should be paid to four weeks. Remove entitlement to the 50+ elements of the working tax credit.

Clarify the position in relation to children with their sixteenth birthday falling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll