header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax on feelings

Income tax may be levied on payments made for injury to feelings, the Upper Tribunal has held.

Moorthy v HMRC [2016] UKUT 13 TCC concerned the extent to which a payment made by an employer to settle a claim for unfair dismissal and age discrimination following termination by redundancy could be liable to income tax.

The employee, Moorthy, received from his employer statutory redundancy pay of £10,640 and, following mediation over his claim, £200,000 compensation for loss of office and employment.

A dispute arose between Moorthy and HMRC over whether compensation for injury to feelings was taxable.

Delivering her judgment, Mrs Justice Rose held that, while payment made “on account of injury to an employee” is tax-exempt, the “injury” must be a medical condition not injury to feelings.

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll