header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax on feelings

Income tax may be levied on payments made for injury to feelings, the Upper Tribunal has held.

Moorthy v HMRC [2016] UKUT 13 TCC concerned the extent to which a payment made by an employer to settle a claim for unfair dismissal and age discrimination following termination by redundancy could be liable to income tax.

The employee, Moorthy, received from his employer statutory redundancy pay of £10,640 and, following mediation over his claim, £200,000 compensation for loss of office and employment.

A dispute arose between Moorthy and HMRC over whether compensation for injury to feelings was taxable.

Delivering her judgment, Mrs Justice Rose held that, while payment made “on account of injury to an employee” is tax-exempt, the “injury” must be a medical condition not injury to feelings.

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll