header-logo header-logo

14 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax refuge loophole

A new register of companies’ beneficial owners won’t prevent “real owners” taking refuge, according to James Mather, of Serle Court.

The requirement on English companies and LLPs to hold a register of “people with significant control” came into force on 6 April. The government hopes the register will reveal the reality of who owns a company, regardless of the paperwork. Obscure company ownership structures can facilitate tax evasion, money laundering and other wrongdoings.

Writing in NLJ this week, however, Mather points out that people will still be able to hide behind offshore trust structures due to a number of flaws in the new rules: “In a significant loophole, corporate trustees—which will be the norm in the offshore arrangements of interest to the authorities and third parties—are not explicitly catered for.”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll