header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Tax , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

TAX CLEARANCES
IHT: BUSINESS PROPERTY RELIEF
PAYMENTS OUT OF SIPPS

TAX CLEARANCES

HM Revenue & Customs (the Revenue) has announced a non statutory clearance service, the purpose being to provide certainty for businesses operating in the UK regarding tax issues. The press release explains that the guidance is for the use of businesses only. Non business taxpayers remain subject to Code of Practice 10 where technical enquiries will be dealt with only if they arise from the last four Finance Acts.

This is an amazingly helpful and welcome development. It contrasts starkly with its earlier stance that under self assessment the responsibility is on the taxpayer to get everything right and the Revenue has no obligation to provide confirmation or any other guidance regarding the accuracy of a particular tax treatment—unless it falls within the extremely small number of cases where a statutory clearance procedure exists.

The Revenue will now provide written confirmation of its view on the application of tax law to a specific transaction or event and aim to do so within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll