header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Tax , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

TAX CLEARANCES
IHT: BUSINESS PROPERTY RELIEF
PAYMENTS OUT OF SIPPS

TAX CLEARANCES

HM Revenue & Customs (the Revenue) has announced a non statutory clearance service, the purpose being to provide certainty for businesses operating in the UK regarding tax issues. The press release explains that the guidance is for the use of businesses only. Non business taxpayers remain subject to Code of Practice 10 where technical enquiries will be dealt with only if they arise from the last four Finance Acts.

This is an amazingly helpful and welcome development. It contrasts starkly with its earlier stance that under self assessment the responsibility is on the taxpayer to get everything right and the Revenue has no obligation to provide confirmation or any other guidance regarding the accuracy of a particular tax treatment—unless it falls within the extremely small number of cases where a statutory clearance procedure exists.

The Revenue will now provide written confirmation of its view on the application of tax law to a specific transaction or event and aim to do so within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll