header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Offshore accounts, Inheritance tax - Furbs, Foreign dividends

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

Last year HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) was successful in its application to the courts seeking a Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA 1970), s 20 notice to obtain information about customers of Barclays Bank who had UK addresses but also had credit cards which were associated with offshore bank accounts (see 156 NLJ 7222, p 717). Having obtained this information, it followed up with another application seeking information about customers with UK addresses and non UK bank accounts (see 156 NLJ 7232, p 1097). This was generally thought to be the tip of an iceberg/thin end of wedge/battering ram—select appropriate metaphor; so it has proved.

Breach of confidentiality

Those who have offshore accounts and do not properly disclose the income on their tax return deserve to be pursued and penalised by HMRC—but I seriously wonder whether the destruction of banking confidentiality is necessary to achieve this end. Why should a substantial number of people who have dealt with their tax affairs properly have their personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll