header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

05 October 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines examines some recent tax-related cases

The recent case of Bourges-Maunoury: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul) has real possibilities. The issue here was that the taxpayers (actually, the non-taxpayers) were employed by the EU and received earnings and pensions as a result of that employment. They were resident in France and in principle liable to wealth tax. The French tax authorities regarded the funds derived from their employment with the EU as part of their wealth for wealth tax purposes and this was upheld by the French courts.

However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has declared that member states cannot impose any taxation which is based wholly or partly on the payment of salary to the official by the EU.

We do not have any wealth tax in the UK but we do have inheritance tax and it is not difficult to conclude that funds which can be traced to the earnings from an EU employment, cannot have UK taxes imposed upon them.

Indeed, I do not see why the purchase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll