header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines some recent tax-related cases

The recent case of Bourges-Maunoury: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul) has real possibilities. The issue here was that the taxpayers (actually, the non-taxpayers) were employed by the EU and received earnings and pensions as a result of that employment. They were resident in France and in principle liable to wealth tax. The French tax authorities regarded the funds derived from their employment with the EU as part of their wealth for wealth tax purposes and this was upheld by the French courts.

However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has declared that member states cannot impose any taxation which is based wholly or partly on the payment of salary to the official by the EU.

We do not have any wealth tax in the UK but we do have inheritance tax and it is not difficult to conclude that funds which can be traced to the earnings from an EU employment, cannot have UK taxes imposed upon them.

Indeed, I do not see why the purchase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll