header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines some recent tax-related cases

The recent case of Bourges-Maunoury: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul) has real possibilities. The issue here was that the taxpayers (actually, the non-taxpayers) were employed by the EU and received earnings and pensions as a result of that employment. They were resident in France and in principle liable to wealth tax. The French tax authorities regarded the funds derived from their employment with the EU as part of their wealth for wealth tax purposes and this was upheld by the French courts.

However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has declared that member states cannot impose any taxation which is based wholly or partly on the payment of salary to the official by the EU.

We do not have any wealth tax in the UK but we do have inheritance tax and it is not difficult to conclude that funds which can be traced to the earnings from an EU employment, cannot have UK taxes imposed upon them.

Indeed, I do not see why the purchase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll