header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

vaines_0

Peter Vaines wonders whether the meaning of “discovery” is too wide

If HMRC wish to raise an assessment beyond the enquiry window they must first make a discovery. That means the tax officer has to discover that:

  • there are income and gains which ought to be assessed;
  • an assessment to tax has become insufficient; or
  • a relief which had been given has become excessive.

In these circumstances, Taxes Management Act 1970(TMA 1970), s 29 allows HMRC to raise a discovery assessment—providing certain other conditions are satisfied.

We know from Charlton (and many other authorities) that a discovery means that it has newly appeared to an officer that there is an insufficiency in an assessment. A change of view, a change of opinion or the correction of an oversight is a discovery for this purpose. It can also include a discovery that the law had been wrongly applied or that the officer had made a mistake about the law.

The meaning of “discovery” is therefore extremely wide. However, it must mean something. What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll