header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

09 January 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail
vaines_0

Peter Vaines wonders whether the meaning of “discovery” is too wide

If HMRC wish to raise an assessment beyond the enquiry window they must first make a discovery. That means the tax officer has to discover that:

  • there are income and gains which ought to be assessed;
  • an assessment to tax has become insufficient; or
  • a relief which had been given has become excessive.

In these circumstances, Taxes Management Act 1970(TMA 1970), s 29 allows HMRC to raise a discovery assessment—providing certain other conditions are satisfied.

We know from Charlton (and many other authorities) that a discovery means that it has newly appeared to an officer that there is an insufficiency in an assessment. A change of view, a change of opinion or the correction of an oversight is a discovery for this purpose. It can also include a discovery that the law had been wrongly applied or that the officer had made a mistake about the law.

The meaning of “discovery” is therefore extremely wide. However, it must mean something. What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll