header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines turns the spotlight on trading losses, unlawful dividends… and deep gains

Where a company transfers its trade to another company, s 343 of the Taxes Act 1988 allows the successor company to be treated as continuing carrying on the same trade and to benefit from the accumulated trading losses. However, s 343 requires there to be at least 75% common ownership of the companies before and after the transfer and that the successor company actually carries on the relevant trade.

The recent case of Barkers of Malton Limited v HMRC SpC 689 was concerned with the application of s 343 and it was agreed that all the relevant conditions were satisfied —except one. The only question for consideration was whether or not the successor company continued to carry on the trade in question.

The background is not really important, but the business had been failing and needed to be separated from a valuable property, so the trade was transferred to a subsidiary and then on to another company. Unfortunately, the first transfer took

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll