header-logo header-logo

02 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Taylor Wessing—Kim Wedral

Employment specialist joins Cambridge office as partner

Taylor Wessing has strengthened its Cambridge office with the appointment of Kim Wedral as employment partner. Wedral, who previously led the Innovate Employment group at an international firm, has extensive experience advising businesses and investors in the scale-up and growth space. Her hire underscores the firm’s commitment to the Golden Triangle and its international client base.

Wedral’s practice focuses on global talent challenges, including fundraising, M&A, expansion into new territories, complex exits and disputes, HR strategy and immigration matters. She also brings extensive international exposure, supporting clients with global expansion and staff mobility. ‘Her impressive track record and leading market recognition will be invaluable,’ said Paul Callaghan, head of the employment, pensions & mobility group in the UK.

The new partner has strong recognition in the innovation sector, particularly with tech and life sciences clients and their investors. Her appointment supports Taylor Wessing’s international growth strategy and enhances its employment offering to clients with complex cross-border needs. ‘Providing advice to investors and businesses operating within the tech and life sciences triangle of London, Cambridge and Oxford is a key area of growth for the firm,’ added UK managing partner Shane Gleghorn.

Commenting on her move, Wedral said: ‘It’s a great time to be joining Taylor Wessing, especially with the opportunity to build upon my established practice supporting tech and life sciences clients with their global talent challenges. The firm’s wide international coverage gives us a fantastic opportunity to develop our international employment platform, and I look forward to leveraging my network within the Golden Triangle to drive growth for the firm.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll