header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Teacake tales

Taxation

UK tax authorities breached EU law when they refused to refund £3.5m of VAT paid incorrectly by Marks & Spencer (M&S) over 20 years, according to a preliminary opinion from advocate general Juliane Kokott. Marks & Spencer plc v Revenue and Custom Commissioners concerned the legality of the UK’s three-year limitation period for recovering incorrectly paid VAT. A final judgment is expected from the European Court of Justice this year, and if it follows the opinion, says Andrew Loan, assistant solicitor at Macfarlanes, it could open the floodgates to claims for repayment of VAT incorrectly paid between 1973 and 2005.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll