header-logo header-logo

Technology & the criminal justice system

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail
84237
Fred Allen explains why taking a critical approach to emerging technologies is vital
  • Unfairness and discrimination can be embedded in justice technology yet there is little means of scrutiny.

Using tech to solve problems without properly scrutinising its efficacy or considering the regulatory framework within which it has to operate can lead to expensive and embarrassing mistakes. The criminal justice system has already faced regulatory action in connection with the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Matrix. Following concerns the Matrix included people who posed little or no risk, the London Mayor ordered a review which, according to press reports, led to about one thousand young, black men’s names being removed.

A House of Lords report published in March, suggests the criminal justice system could be forced into another humiliating policy retreat (‘Technology rules? The advent of new technologies in the justice system’). The report by the Justice and Home Affairs Committee detailed a range of concerns with the technology itself, transparency about its deployment, and the oversight of its use. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll