header-logo header-logo

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail

Technology & the criminal justice system

84237
Fred Allen explains why taking a critical approach to emerging technologies is vital
  • Unfairness and discrimination can be embedded in justice technology yet there is little means of scrutiny.

Using tech to solve problems without properly scrutinising its efficacy or considering the regulatory framework within which it has to operate can lead to expensive and embarrassing mistakes. The criminal justice system has already faced regulatory action in connection with the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Matrix. Following concerns the Matrix included people who posed little or no risk, the London Mayor ordered a review which, according to press reports, led to about one thousand young, black men’s names being removed.

A House of Lords report published in March, suggests the criminal justice system could be forced into another humiliating policy retreat (‘Technology rules? The advent of new technologies in the justice system’). The report by the Justice and Home Affairs Committee detailed a range of concerns with the technology itself, transparency about its deployment, and the oversight of its use.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll