header-logo header-logo

09 February 2024 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Tell, or else: costs & agency fees

157356
Definitive guidance on the right to a bill breakdown would be useful, says Dominic Regan

Is a paying party entitled to see a breakdown of a bill rendered by a medical reporting agency? An appeal destined for the Court of Appeal this year has been abruptly abandoned.

In the personal injury arena, it is the norm to outsource the exercise of obtaining medical evidence to an agency. In Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Hoskin [2023], HHJ Bird heard an appeal in Manchester from the decision of a deputy district judge sitting as a regional costs judge. The dispute concerned two items invoiced by a well-known medical reporting agency, Premex Services Limited. It had billed the claimant’s solicitor for two medical reports and in turn, those solicitors were seeking to recoup the cost from the defendant. One report had cost £5,400 and the other was for £8,775, to both of which VAT was to be added.

‘Reasonable & proportionate’

A request for a simple breakdown of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll