header-logo header-logo

Tell, or else: costs & agency fees

09 February 2024 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
157356
Definitive guidance on the right to a bill breakdown would be useful, says Dominic Regan

Is a paying party entitled to see a breakdown of a bill rendered by a medical reporting agency? An appeal destined for the Court of Appeal this year has been abruptly abandoned.

In the personal injury arena, it is the norm to outsource the exercise of obtaining medical evidence to an agency. In Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Hoskin [2023], HHJ Bird heard an appeal in Manchester from the decision of a deputy district judge sitting as a regional costs judge. The dispute concerned two items invoiced by a well-known medical reporting agency, Premex Services Limited. It had billed the claimant’s solicitor for two medical reports and in turn, those solicitors were seeking to recoup the cost from the defendant. One report had cost £5,400 and the other was for £8,775, to both of which VAT was to be added.

‘Reasonable & proportionate’

A request for a simple breakdown of how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll