header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Telling porky pies

nlj_7662_comment

Michael Zander considers some classic instances of lies told about the Human Rights Act

The Human Rights Act 1998 came into force in October 2000. A mere 15 years later the Conservative Government aims to abolish the Act. The popular press has played a major role in demonising the Act. Over and over again it has peddled false stories, gleefully and irresponsibly then taken up by politicians.

Catgate

The best known perhaps is “catgate”—Home Secretary, Theresa May, telling the Conservative Party Conference in 2011 of the illegal immigrant “who cannot be deported because—and I am not making this up—he had pet a cat”. It is true that the first immigration judge in his judgment mentioned joint purchase of Maya the cat as one of the many indications that the illegal immigrant had an established relationship with his partner—but it was not the reason for that judge’s decision and in the judgment on appeal the cat was not even mentioned. The reason he could not be deported was that the UK Border Agency had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll