header-logo header-logo

A temporary reprieve?

10 April 2015 / James Whittaker , Dominic Vincent
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Vincent & James Whittaker discuss the delay to the introduction of the LASPO provisions for insolvency cases

The recent ministerial statement confirming that the government will delay the prohibitive effects of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in relation to insolvency proceedings has been warmly welcomed by insolvency practitioners and those solicitors who represent them. Resulting directly from the recommendations of the 2010 Jackson reforms, one of the main effects of LASPO was intended to be the prohibition of the recovery of “no win no fee” success fees and of after-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums from unsuccessful parties in litigation. The LASPO prohibitions came into general effect on 1 April 2013 for the majority of litigation cases and were intended to come into effect for insolvency litigation cases in April 2015. However the ministerial statement published on 26 February 2015 makes it clear that the government will delay the introduction of the LASPO restrictions in insolvency proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll