header-logo header-logo

10 April 2015 / James Whittaker , Dominic Vincent
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A temporary reprieve?

Dominic Vincent & James Whittaker discuss the delay to the introduction of the LASPO provisions for insolvency cases

The recent ministerial statement confirming that the government will delay the prohibitive effects of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in relation to insolvency proceedings has been warmly welcomed by insolvency practitioners and those solicitors who represent them. Resulting directly from the recommendations of the 2010 Jackson reforms, one of the main effects of LASPO was intended to be the prohibition of the recovery of “no win no fee” success fees and of after-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums from unsuccessful parties in litigation. The LASPO prohibitions came into general effect on 1 April 2013 for the majority of litigation cases and were intended to come into effect for insolvency litigation cases in April 2015. However the ministerial statement published on 26 February 2015 makes it clear that the government will delay the introduction of the LASPO restrictions in insolvency proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll