header-logo header-logo

10 April 2015 / James Whittaker , Dominic Vincent
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A temporary reprieve?

Dominic Vincent & James Whittaker discuss the delay to the introduction of the LASPO provisions for insolvency cases

The recent ministerial statement confirming that the government will delay the prohibitive effects of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in relation to insolvency proceedings has been warmly welcomed by insolvency practitioners and those solicitors who represent them. Resulting directly from the recommendations of the 2010 Jackson reforms, one of the main effects of LASPO was intended to be the prohibition of the recovery of “no win no fee” success fees and of after-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums from unsuccessful parties in litigation. The LASPO prohibitions came into general effect on 1 April 2013 for the majority of litigation cases and were intended to come into effect for insolvency litigation cases in April 2015. However the ministerial statement published on 26 February 2015 makes it clear that the government will delay the introduction of the LASPO restrictions in insolvency proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll