header-logo header-logo

A temporary reprieve?

10 April 2015 / James Whittaker , Dominic Vincent
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Vincent & James Whittaker discuss the delay to the introduction of the LASPO provisions for insolvency cases

The recent ministerial statement confirming that the government will delay the prohibitive effects of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in relation to insolvency proceedings has been warmly welcomed by insolvency practitioners and those solicitors who represent them. Resulting directly from the recommendations of the 2010 Jackson reforms, one of the main effects of LASPO was intended to be the prohibition of the recovery of “no win no fee” success fees and of after-the-event (ATE) insurance premiums from unsuccessful parties in litigation. The LASPO prohibitions came into general effect on 1 April 2013 for the majority of litigation cases and were intended to come into effect for insolvency litigation cases in April 2015. However the ministerial statement published on 26 February 2015 makes it clear that the government will delay the introduction of the LASPO restrictions in insolvency proceedings

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll