header-logo header-logo

Terms of service

06 June 2013 / Mark Hill KC
Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail
cover_bible

What legal obligations are owed to the servants of God? Mark Hill QC discusses the judgment & impact of Preston

"Ye Servants of God, Your Master proclaim”

So wrote Charles Wesley, hymnodist and father of Methodism, in the 18th century. But what legal obligations are owed by an earthly master to a servant of God as a matter of secular employment law today? This was the question addressed by the Supreme Court in President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 29.

Facts

Haley Preston was ordained into the Methodist Church and in 2006 she was appointed to the post of Superintendent Minister to the Redruth circuit, from which she felt compelled to resign after three years. She brought a claim in the employment tribunal, alleging unfair constructive dismissal. A preliminary issue was whether she was an employee of the Methodist Conference within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. If employed under a contract of service, she would qualify, bringing with it statutory protection against unfair dismissal.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll