header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 June 2013 / Mark Hill KC
Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Terms of service

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
cover_bible

What legal obligations are owed to the servants of God? Mark Hill QC discusses the judgment & impact of Preston

"Ye Servants of God, Your Master proclaim”

So wrote Charles Wesley, hymnodist and father of Methodism, in the 18th century. But what legal obligations are owed by an earthly master to a servant of God as a matter of secular employment law today? This was the question addressed by the Supreme Court in President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 29.

Facts

Haley Preston was ordained into the Methodist Church and in 2006 she was appointed to the post of Superintendent Minister to the Redruth circuit, from which she felt compelled to resign after three years. She brought a claim in the employment tribunal, alleging unfair constructive dismissal. A preliminary issue was whether she was an employee of the Methodist Conference within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. If employed under a contract of service, she would qualify, bringing with it statutory protection against unfair dismissal.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll