header-logo header-logo

Terms of service

06 June 2013 / Mark Hill KC
Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail
cover_bible

What legal obligations are owed to the servants of God? Mark Hill QC discusses the judgment & impact of Preston

"Ye Servants of God, Your Master proclaim”

So wrote Charles Wesley, hymnodist and father of Methodism, in the 18th century. But what legal obligations are owed by an earthly master to a servant of God as a matter of secular employment law today? This was the question addressed by the Supreme Court in President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 29.

Facts

Haley Preston was ordained into the Methodist Church and in 2006 she was appointed to the post of Superintendent Minister to the Redruth circuit, from which she felt compelled to resign after three years. She brought a claim in the employment tribunal, alleging unfair constructive dismissal. A preliminary issue was whether she was an employee of the Methodist Conference within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. If employed under a contract of service, she would qualify, bringing with it statutory protection against unfair dismissal.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll