header-logo header-logo

Thackray Williams—Jennifer Nicol

29 September 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Firm bolsters commercial team with senior employment partner hire

Thackray Williams has strengthened its commercial practice with the appointment of employment lawyer Jennifer Nicol as one of its London partners. With more than 20 years’ experience gained at a City law firm and as a consultant, she will also lead the team at the firm’s City of London office. Co-managing partner Emma Thomson said Ms Nicol will ‘significantly augment our current offering in these areas, enabling us to enhance the proactive support we provide to our existing clients’.

Previously a partner at specialist workplace law firm Doyle Clayton, where she led the Canary Wharf team, Ms Nicol has advised clients across the financial, insurance, media and technology sectors, as well as senior executives and family-owned businesses. She said: ‘I am excited to be joining Thackray Williams, a firm highly regarded for its excellent workplace culture as well as its legal expertise, and I look forward to working with the existing team of excellent employment lawyers.’

With specialist training in workplace inclusion, she has a particular focus on wellbeing and mental health in the workplace. ‘My in-depth training in workplace inclusion and discrimination means I always strive to understand what HR clients and leaders need, above and beyond good commercial advice,’ she explained. ‘I also represent a lot of individual clients in situations that may be complex and challenging. My aim is always to keep the person and their objectives at the heart of the advice I provide.’

Reflecting on her decision to return to private practice after three years in Australia, Ms Nicol said: ‘Of the various employment offers I received, the one from Thackray Williams was by a country mile the most exciting and interesting – and that’s largely down to the people. It is a highly successful firm which is led by very impressive people. I am especially looking forward to supporting the managing partners, who have a clear vision for the future growth of the firm.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll