header-logo header-logo

27 October 2023 / Mark Solon
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The 20-page expert witness report: will font size reduce?

144112
Mark Solon considers the case for brevity as the intermediate track ushers in a new rule
  • A 20-page rule applies to expert reports for the intermediate track.
  • Overall shorter is better but the potential problems should be considered.

Expert witnesses are getting restless. The new intermediate track for civil claims is to limit expert reports to 20 pages. Is this a good thing that will speed up justice and help courts focus on what really matters or will justice not be done?

The 20-page rule

Rule 28.14 (3) states that unless the court orders otherwise, in proceedings started after 1 October 2023: ‘Aany expert report shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any necessary photographs, plans and academic or technical articles attached to the report.’ This is an important change for experts who will now have to be concise. Mark Twain famously said: ‘I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.’ Keeping to the point may not be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll