header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 July 2024 / Fern Schofield , Michael Ranson
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

The ABCs of overage

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
182211
Fern Schofield & Michael Ranson set out the various means of securing overage obligations
  • Securing overage obligations raises a variety of legal, practical and commercial difficulties.
  • In order to advise clients about how best to secure overage, practitioners need to be aware of a variety of legal principles, statutes and case law.
  • This article is a guide to those legal issues, with suggestions as to three different ways in which overage obligations might be secured and a warning about the use of restrictive covenants.

When it comes to securing overage obligations, a number of different options present themselves, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Which is the best choice in the context of any given transaction will depend on the legal landscape and various practical and commercial priorities.

Why is it difficult to secure overage obligations?

Before turning to the different methods of securing obligations to pay overage, and the advantages and disadvantages of each, it is helpful to take a step back and consider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll