header-logo header-logo

The Arbitration Act 1996: a reflection at 25 years

29 April 2022 / Valya Georgieva , Ravi Aswani
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
79660
Ravi Aswani & Valya Georgieva consider a quarter-century of the Arbitration Act 1996: where might it go from here?
  • The current arbitration landscape in England and Wales.
  • The Law Commission review of the Arbitration Act 1996 and areas for possible reforms.
  • Updates to the Commercial Court Guide aimed at deterring unmeritorious challenges to arbitral awards.

2022 marks 25 years since the commencement of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) on 31 January 1997. The consensus is that this has been a very successful piece of legislation, consolidating key aspects of the then more fragmented legislation and case law governing arbitration in England and Wales, drawing inspiration from the UNCITRAL Model Law for certain provisions, and taking into account a range of other factors and interests in respect of other provisions.

The pace of legislative reform in a jurisdiction like England and Wales is relatively slow. After several years of rumours, the Law Commission on 30 November 2021 confirmed that it would indeed conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll