header-logo header-logo

The Arbitration Act 1996: a reflection at 25 years

29 April 2022 / Valya Georgieva , Ravi Aswani
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
79660
Ravi Aswani & Valya Georgieva consider a quarter-century of the Arbitration Act 1996: where might it go from here?
  • The current arbitration landscape in England and Wales.
  • The Law Commission review of the Arbitration Act 1996 and areas for possible reforms.
  • Updates to the Commercial Court Guide aimed at deterring unmeritorious challenges to arbitral awards.

2022 marks 25 years since the commencement of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) on 31 January 1997. The consensus is that this has been a very successful piece of legislation, consolidating key aspects of the then more fragmented legislation and case law governing arbitration in England and Wales, drawing inspiration from the UNCITRAL Model Law for certain provisions, and taking into account a range of other factors and interests in respect of other provisions.

The pace of legislative reform in a jurisdiction like England and Wales is relatively slow. After several years of rumours, the Law Commission on 30 November 2021 confirmed that it would indeed conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll