header-logo header-logo

The BBC: under (political) pressure?

07 April 2023 / John Gould
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Media , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
117930
Was the BBC’s handling of the Gary Lineker case about the perception of impartiality or of independence? John Gould puts the broadcaster’s guidelines under the microscope
  • The BBC’s error in its handling of the controversy surrounding Gary Lineker’s tweet criticising government rhetoric appears to have been that it abandoned rules and procedure, and instead became involved in a quasi-disciplinary process to try to produce an acceptable result for its stakeholders.

Every now and again, professional rules and guidelines become relevant to something which an ordinary person might care about. Fortunately this does not happen that often, but when it does, the plucky attempts of journalists to explain it all in less than 90 seconds or in a few column inches are rarely very successful. It is hard to simplify sub-clauses or gloss guidance. Clauses have no feelings to report; when they conflict, it isn’t at all the sort of conflict that makes good television.

What, I ask rhetorically, would someone care about if not Match of the Day

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll