header-logo header-logo

17 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7824 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The beast from the East

Warning: Japanese knotweed can seriously damage your property. Alec Samuels reports

  • Japanese knotweed: fear and terror.
  • Property rights.
  • Remedies.

Japanese knotweed. The mere words strike anxiety, fear and terror into every property owner. It has been described as pernicious, vicious and contaminating. It can seriously damage property; it is extremely difficult to eradicate or control; it inhibits development, and must be buried deep or covered up or removed after development can take place, and removal is a difficult, extensive and expensive operation.

Violation

The owner of property has the right to quiet enjoyment, the right to use and enjoy, to comfortable and convenient use and the right to the amenity of his property, without interference. The violation of this right gives the right to the remedy for the tort of nuisance. The damage may be physical, eg damage to the soil, but need not be physical. For example, encroaching or penetrating noise, smoke, smell or dust may suffice for nuisance.

Blackacre has Japanese knotweed, proved or admitted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll