header-logo header-logo

26 September 2019 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

The capacity jigsaw

Chris Williams provides an update on the evidence & standard of proof required to gauge mental capacity
  • Mental capacity, whether capacity to exercise power of amendment of trust deed.
  • The level of understanding required depends on the circumstances of each case.

Whether or not a person has the requisite mental capacity to exercise a power under a trust deed is often not easy to establish. The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands had to consider this question recently in CI Trustees Ltd v RDK & GMB (2018) FSD 199 of 2015(IKJ) and the case provides useful guidance as to the standard of proof, evidence and other relevant considerations required to determine the question, often in circumstances where facts and circumstances are case specific.

Facts

Proceedings in CI Trustees Ltd v RDK and GMB (2018) FSD 199 of 2015(IKJ) Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (FSD) were started by the trustee on 9 December 2015 to determine who was the true beneficiary of a trust (the O Trust) declared by the settlor.

  • The
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll