header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2019 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

The capacity jigsaw

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Chris Williams provides an update on the evidence & standard of proof required to gauge mental capacity
  • Mental capacity, whether capacity to exercise power of amendment of trust deed.
  • The level of understanding required depends on the circumstances of each case.

Whether or not a person has the requisite mental capacity to exercise a power under a trust deed is often not easy to establish. The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands had to consider this question recently in CI Trustees Ltd v RDK & GMB (2018) FSD 199 of 2015(IKJ) and the case provides useful guidance as to the standard of proof, evidence and other relevant considerations required to determine the question, often in circumstances where facts and circumstances are case specific.

Facts

Proceedings in CI Trustees Ltd v RDK and GMB (2018) FSD 199 of 2015(IKJ) Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (FSD) were started by the trustee on 9 December 2015 to determine who was the true beneficiary of a trust (the O Trust) declared by the settlor.

  • The
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll