header-logo header-logo

The case for a representative judiciary

12 February 2020 / Simon Garrod
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
15627
Opening up the senior judiciary to chartered legal executives is key to tackling its diversity problem, says Simon Garrod

A recent report by law reform group Justice has warned that our senior judiciary is still dominated by white men, with progress towards improving diversity proving lamentably slow (see ‘Increasing Judicial Diversity: An Update’, https://bit.ly/38i78zV).

Only a third of judges in courts are female and just seven per cent are BAME (black and minority ethnic), compared with 13% of the population in England and Wales. Those from higher socio-economic groups dominate, with three in four existing senior judges having attended Oxbridge and 60% having been privately educated, despite only seven per cent of the country attending fee-paying schools.

Failure

The failure of our judiciary to reflect the society its serves has long been a cause for concern. It is perhaps not so surprising when you look at the whole legal profession which has struggled to open itself up—especially where it would make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll