header-logo header-logo

12 February 2020 / Simon Garrod
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The case for a representative judiciary

15627
Opening up the senior judiciary to chartered legal executives is key to tackling its diversity problem, says Simon Garrod

A recent report by law reform group Justice has warned that our senior judiciary is still dominated by white men, with progress towards improving diversity proving lamentably slow (see ‘Increasing Judicial Diversity: An Update’, https://bit.ly/38i78zV).

Only a third of judges in courts are female and just seven per cent are BAME (black and minority ethnic), compared with 13% of the population in England and Wales. Those from higher socio-economic groups dominate, with three in four existing senior judges having attended Oxbridge and 60% having been privately educated, despite only seven per cent of the country attending fee-paying schools.

Failure

The failure of our judiciary to reflect the society its serves has long been a cause for concern. It is perhaps not so surprising when you look at the whole legal profession which has struggled to open itself up—especially where it would make the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll