header-logo header-logo

The EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill (No 2) (Pt 2)

24 January 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
14747
Michael Zander on the final stages
  • Despite inflicting five defeats in the House of Lords, the Opposition accepted that the Government would overturn all the amendments and that they would have to accept it.
  • Royal Assent would be given in time for the Withdrawal Agreement to be considered by the European Parliament.

Until the Report stage in the House of Lords last Monday (January 20) the Government still hoped that its European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill would come back to the Commons unamended. But in the end the Lords decided there were issues on which they had to make a stand.

The Government does not command a majority in the Lords and the word had gone out from Ministers that amendments would not be welcomed. During the three days of the Committee stage in the Lords (14, 15,16 January) not a single amendment was put to a vote. Each proposer ran their proposition up the hill but then bottled and withdrew the amendment.

One reason

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll