header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 August 2020 / Jonathan Kirk KC , Thomas Samuels
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

The Financial Ombudsman Service: Cause for concern?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25793
The Financial Ombudsman Service: a matter of principle, ask Jonathan Kirk QC & Thomas Samuels

In brief

  • In May 2020, HHJ Dight CBE handed-down his long-awaited decision in Adams v Options SIPP UK LLP [2020] EWHC 1229.
  • The disparity between the analysis and outcome in that decision and the approach to similar complaints made to the Financial Ombudsman Service, is a cause for concern in a heavily-regulated financial services sector.

In Adams v Options SIPP UK LLP [2020] EWHC 1229, [2020] All ER (D) 136 (May) in around February 2012, Mr Adams, a self-employed road haulage contractor, wanted to review his existing personal pension arrangements. He therefore responded to an online advertisement placed by CLP Brokers Sociedad (CLP), which referred to better returns on your pension through investments offered by them. CLP advised Mr Adams that an investment in store pods, from Store First Limited held in a self-invested personal pension (SIPP) would improve the performance of his pension. Accordingly, he transferred his existing provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
Read All
Legal Action Group set out 2026 events calendar
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
NLJ this week: Volunteers, promotions & perilous appeals
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll