header-logo header-logo

30 June 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The importance of juries

Criminal barristers have voted against cutting jury trials and overwhelmingly in favour of converting more buildings into courts
A high turnout (92% of the Criminal Bar) responded to a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey on jury trials and extended hours. Only six per cent would consider supporting restrictions on the right to trial by jury, but 83% were in favour of temporarily reducing jury numbers and two-thirds supported temporarily replacing the jury with a judge and two magistrates in either-way offences. 95% favoured the use of additional buildings outside the court estate. See the full results at: bit.ly/38fefts.

Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland revealed last week that legislation to allow trial without jury in certain categories of cases is being seriously considered.

A coalition of Young Legal Aid Lawyers, Society of Black Lawyers and other groups said this week that ‘abolishing juries for either-way offences under the guise of a COVID-19 emergency response is disingenuous and a threat to the integrity of our criminal justice system’, in a statement that highlighted the lack of judicial diversity.

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll