header-logo header-logo

30 June 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The importance of juries

Criminal barristers have voted against cutting jury trials and overwhelmingly in favour of converting more buildings into courts
A high turnout (92% of the Criminal Bar) responded to a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey on jury trials and extended hours. Only six per cent would consider supporting restrictions on the right to trial by jury, but 83% were in favour of temporarily reducing jury numbers and two-thirds supported temporarily replacing the jury with a judge and two magistrates in either-way offences. 95% favoured the use of additional buildings outside the court estate. See the full results at: bit.ly/38fefts.

Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland revealed last week that legislation to allow trial without jury in certain categories of cases is being seriously considered.

A coalition of Young Legal Aid Lawyers, Society of Black Lawyers and other groups said this week that ‘abolishing juries for either-way offences under the guise of a COVID-19 emergency response is disingenuous and a threat to the integrity of our criminal justice system’, in a statement that highlighted the lack of judicial diversity.

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll