header-logo header-logo

The insider: 7 February 2025

07 February 2025 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Opinion , Collective action , Profession , Privacy , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail
207255
How will you spend your £4 Mastercard payout? Dominic Regan tots up collective action anti-climaxes & laments expectation versus reality

The Supreme Court, which decided 43 cases in 2024, is to start hearing on 1 April a three-day long appeal in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 1282. Car dealers who arranged finance for their customers received a secret commission from the lender. In the case of the lead claimant, the commission was £1,650 on the acquisition of a modest Suzuki Swift costing £6,499. The Court of Appeal held that the dealer owed a fiduciary duty to the purchaser. If upheld, the cost to lenders could be as much as £44bn, according to HSBC.

Group actions being pursued in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) have become fashionable. However, the first case to be tried was slung out. The class representative was pursuing compensation in excess of £1.1bn on behalf of up to 3.7m customers of BT. Simmons and Simmons saw off the entire claim, reported at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll