header-logo header-logo

07 February 2025 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Opinion , Collective action , Profession , Privacy , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

The insider: 7 February 2025

207255
How will you spend your £4 Mastercard payout? Dominic Regan tots up collective action anti-climaxes & laments expectation versus reality

The Supreme Court, which decided 43 cases in 2024, is to start hearing on 1 April a three-day long appeal in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 1282. Car dealers who arranged finance for their customers received a secret commission from the lender. In the case of the lead claimant, the commission was £1,650 on the acquisition of a modest Suzuki Swift costing £6,499. The Court of Appeal held that the dealer owed a fiduciary duty to the purchaser. If upheld, the cost to lenders could be as much as £44bn, according to HSBC.

Group actions being pursued in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) have become fashionable. However, the first case to be tried was slung out. The class representative was pursuing compensation in excess of £1.1bn on behalf of up to 3.7m customers of BT. Simmons and Simmons saw off the entire claim, reported at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll