header-logo header-logo

07 March 2025 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , ADR , Consumer
printer mail-detail

The insider: 7 March 2025

210375
This month, Dominic Regan covers leapfrog appeals, ‘short sharp mediation’, the role of juniors & table tennis bats in court

The Supreme Court heard a rare leapfrog appeal last month in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. At issue was recoverability of damages for lost years where, as here, the claimant was a child aged but ten at the time of this hearing. C sought to recover damages for loss of income for the period between the end of her life expectancy and what would have been her normal life expectancy. My impression, solely based on what I heard in the opening 30 minutes, was that the court was against her.

In the first ten minutes Lord Reed suggested that an old Court of Appeal decision, Croke (a minor) v Wiseman [1981] 3 All ER 852, [1982] 1 WLR 71, which prohibited recovery in the case of a young, severely injured child, was correct. That decision was binding upon the High Court in CCC,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll