header-logo header-logo

17 September 2021 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7948 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The insider: 17 September 2021

57436
Dominic Regan trumpets the runners and riders for judicial office and literary prizes...and anticipates the start date for fixed costs

My first column in February this year flagged up the fervent desire of Lord Justice Vos, Master of the Rolls, to promote mediation now looks certain that next April the judiciary will be granted powers to order litigants to engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) (‘The insider’, NLJ 12 February 2021, p6). A Civil Justice Council review has agreed that it is lawful to compel participation in an ADR process and that it would be desirable to do so in a variety of disputes. A working party is now considering the way forward. Their agenda includes identifying appropriate cases, sanctions for default, the protection of vulnerable parties and whether a court accredited list of approved mediators should be established. It is already dangerous to even ignore, let alone reject, a suggestion that one should address ADR.

Racing tips

While others seek to predict which football teams will rise to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll