header-logo header-logo

The Lords make their views count

18 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The House of Lords rejected the Government’s controversial amendments dealing with extreme climate protest on Monday, the sixth and last day of the Report stage of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

The clauses cannot be resurrected when the Bill returns to the Commons because they were not included in the Bill when it went to the Lords. To make these provisions law would require a new Bill.

The Lords rejected: the new offence of “locking on” (216 votes to 163); the new offence of obstructing major transport works (208 votes to 154); the new offence of interference with the use or operation of key national infrastructure (198 votes to 153); new powers to stop and search in connection with protest affecting key national infrastructure both with suspicion (205 votes to 141) and without suspicion  (212 votes to 128); and the introduction of Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (199 votes to 124).

The Lords agreed that the maximum penalty for wilful obstruction of the highway should be increased to include 6 months imprisonment, but limited the penalty to obstruction of the 4,300 mile Strategic Road Network. (216 votes to 160) They voted (by 242 to 185) to make misogyny a hate crime by giving the courts the power to make it an aggravating factor in any crime and increase the sentence accordingly.

The amendment was moved by Baroness Newlove (Conservative), former Victims Commissioner. They also approved (by 144 votes to 101) an amendment moved by Lord Best (crossbencher) to repeal the Vagrancy Act 1824 which makes it a crime to beg and to sleep rough.

The House adjourned this final session on this stage of the Bill at 12.45am.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll