header-logo header-logo

18 January 2022
Issue: 7963 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Lords make their views count

The House of Lords rejected the Government’s controversial amendments dealing with extreme climate protest on Monday, the sixth and last day of the Report stage of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

The clauses cannot be resurrected when the Bill returns to the Commons because they were not included in the Bill when it went to the Lords. To make these provisions law would require a new Bill.

The Lords rejected: the new offence of “locking on” (216 votes to 163); the new offence of obstructing major transport works (208 votes to 154); the new offence of interference with the use or operation of key national infrastructure (198 votes to 153); new powers to stop and search in connection with protest affecting key national infrastructure both with suspicion (205 votes to 141) and without suspicion  (212 votes to 128); and the introduction of Serious Disruption Prevention Orders (199 votes to 124).

The Lords agreed that the maximum penalty for wilful obstruction of the highway should be increased to include 6 months imprisonment, but limited the penalty to obstruction of the 4,300 mile Strategic Road Network. (216 votes to 160) They voted (by 242 to 185) to make misogyny a hate crime by giving the courts the power to make it an aggravating factor in any crime and increase the sentence accordingly.

The amendment was moved by Baroness Newlove (Conservative), former Victims Commissioner. They also approved (by 144 votes to 101) an amendment moved by Lord Best (crossbencher) to repeal the Vagrancy Act 1824 which makes it a crime to beg and to sleep rough.

The House adjourned this final session on this stage of the Bill at 12.45am.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll