header-logo header-logo

The Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Act 2022

13 May 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail
81380
Michael Zander on the final stages
  • Parliamentary ping-pong—Lords’ amendments and government changes.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill received Royal Assent on 28 April, 13 months after it was first introduced. The Lords spent 11 days on the committee stage and six days on the report stage. That resulted in no less than 161 amendments. Many were changes made by the government to its own Bill—though a considerable number had been stimulated by the opposition. There were also changes made by the Lords that were government defeats, but almost all of these were reversed by the Commons.

The provisions triggered by extreme Extinction Rebellion protests were first introduced just before midnight on 24 November 2021, at the very end of the committee stage in the Lords. But because of the late hour, their controversial content, the fact that they had not been considered by the Commons and the short notice, the government did not put them to the vote that night. They were re-introduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll