header-logo header-logo

28 March 2025 / Emily Sherratt
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Features , Pro Bono , Expert Witness , Charities , Profession
printer mail-detail

The power of joining (pro bono) forces

212891
Emily Sherratt explains how the National Pro Bono Centre is closing the expert gap with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

‘Before the legal team stepped in, our voices were being lost.’ This sentiment echoes the struggles of many vulnerable individuals who find themselves navigating the justice system without the necessary resources.

When Marie* took her own life, her family faced numerous unanswered questions, particularly around her medication and abusive partner. With limited resources and no medical expertise, they couldn’t pursue the answers on their own.

Fortunately, a pro bono legal team stepped in, but even they lacked the specialist knowledge required. They turned to the National Pro Bono Centre’s Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme (PBES) and were connected with a psychiatrist who volunteered her time and expertise. Her expert report was invaluable in clarifying complex medical issues, focusing the family’s investigation, and informing the coroner’s inquiry, enabling them to challenge the medical care Marie had received.

For the legal team, ‘the impact was massive’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll